How to quote an architecture project: the 5 ways to quote and when to use each

How to quote an architecture project: per square meter, by stage and hourly cost, % of the real construction value, render and 3D, or a flat package. When to use each and how Limify does the math.

Redraw Social Channels: All Official Accounts by Language
Author
Alexandre Kuhn
Co-founder and marketing director
Sergio is a specialist in generative AI and technology, and leads the Redraw development team.
How to quote an architecture project: the 5 ways to quote and when to use each
4 min
|
06.05.2026
Author
Alexandre Kuhn
Co-founder and marketing director
Sergio is a specialist in generative AI and technology, and leads the Redraw development team.
[

Redraw

]

Create your free account

Start transforming your projects today using Redraw.

I want to register
Share this article

Quick question: how much do you charge for a 180 sqm residential project?

‍

If your answer started with "it depends" and ended with a number that came from a gut feeling, you are quoting on guesswork. It is not a lack of technical skill. Nobody teaches pricing in architecture school, and most firms inherit a rate sheet from a former boss or copy the studio next door.

‍

The problem is that a bad quote does not show up right away. It shows up three months later, when the project has eaten twice the hours, the client has asked for a fifth revision and the margin is gone. This guide covers the five ways to quote an architecture project, what each one actually calculates, when to use it, and how Limify turns each of them into a number you can defend.

‍

Before choosing how to quote: find your hourly cost

‍

Every pricing method depends on one number most architects do not know: what one hour of the firm actually costs.

‍

The math is simple and uncomfortable. Add up your fixed monthly expenses (rent, software, staff, your own salary, taxes, travel). Divide by the hours that are genuinely productive in a month, which rarely go past 120 per person once you subtract meetings, emails and rework. That result is your hourly cost. Anything you charge below it is a loss with a project's name on it.

‍

In Limify this is the first step, not the last. You enter the firm's expenses and the platform calculates the hourly cost automatically. You can also set a target hourly rate based on your income goal, or a custom value for one specific quote. Every pricing model starts from that base. If you want to run the numbers by hand first, the walkthrough is in how to calculate your billable hour rate.

‍

With the hourly cost in hand, now it makes sense to choose how to quote.

‍

The 5 ways to quote an architecture project

‍

1. Pricing per square meter

‍

This is the most common method and the easiest for a client to understand. You set a rate per square meter and multiply it by the project area.

‍

The common mistake is using a single rate for everything. A kitchen takes more detailing hours than a laundry room; a facade follows a different logic than a bedroom. Firms that price well per square meter work with different rates per room and per finish level.

‍

When to use it: projects with a defined area, a client who wants a clear number fast, a firm with a calibrated rate history.

‍

When to avoid it: open scope, renovations with heavy demolition and surprises, projects with high technical complexity.

‍

In Limify's per square meter pricing you pick the rooms (living room, kitchen, facade, garage, garden), enter the rate and area for each one, and the platform calculates the total, the average rate per square meter and the profit margin on the same screen. An interiors project with a 10 sqm living room at R$ 100, a 6 sqm laundry at R$ 150 and a 15 sqm kitchen at R$ 150 lands at R$ 4,150, with an average of R$ 133.87 per sqm. No spreadsheet.

‍

2. Pricing by stage and hourly cost (complete project)

‍

Here you break the project into the stages the standard organizes: schematic design, design development, permit drawings, construction documents, construction administration. Inside each stage you list the activities, estimate the hours for each, multiply by the hourly cost and apply your margin.

‍

This is the most detailed method and the easiest to defend in a negotiation. When the client asks "why so expensive?", you show the 16 hours of site plan work at R$ 125 an hour, not a round number.

‍

When to use it: a complete project with several stages, a client who wants to see the scope before approving, a firm that needs to control cost per stage and per activity.

‍

When to avoid it: a client who just wants a quick number based on area, a one off service covering a single stage.

‍

Limify's complete project is exactly that flow: you set the base hourly cost, add the stages (with suggested categories such as construction documents, construction administration and final review), add activities with time and complexity, and each stage shows total cost and total with margin. Changed the hourly cost? Every item using the default recalculates.

‍

3. Percentage of the real construction value

‍

This is the most widely used model worldwide and increasingly common in Brazil: the design fee is a percentage of what the build will actually cost.

‍

The difference between doing this well or badly is how you arrive at the "real construction value". Guessing R$ 3,000 per sqm is guesswork dressed up as method. The right way is an official index: the CUB, published monthly by state and building standard, or SINAPI. Area times the index for that standard gives the construction value; your percentage on top gives the fee.

‍

When to use it: a residential or commercial project with a defined build, a client who wants full transparency in the math, a firm that charges for the quality of the finished building.

‍

When to avoid it: a very small build (the percentage becomes disproportionate), a renovation where the client supplies the materials, a project with no defined typology.

‍

Limify's real construction value brings CUB and SINAPI updated by state and reference month. You choose the base, enter the area, set the build model (residential, commercial, special), the standard (low, medium, high) and the project standard, then apply your percentage. A medium standard PP-4 residential in Paraná, 123 sqm at R$ 3,136.04 per sqm, gives R$ 385,732.92 of construction. From there to the fee is a percentage, not a guess.

‍

4. Render per image and 3D modeling per hour

‍

Rendering and modeling go into almost every project and almost nobody knows how to charge for them. The mistake is treating both the same way.

‍

Rendering is quoted per image: how many images the space needs, production time and complexity, with the cost per image coming out of your hourly cost. 3D modeling is quoted per hour: how long it takes to model each space, with area and complexity. They are different logics that can go in the same proposal or be split.

‍

One detail for 2026: if the render itself is produced with AI, as in Redraw, the production cost drops a lot but the value delivered to the client does not. That is margin, and it only shows up if the quote separates cost from price.

‍

When to use it: an archviz studio, an architect offering rendering as part of the project, modeling charged separately.

‍

When to avoid it: long animations, immersive VR/AR, a client who wants a flat package with no breakdown.

‍

In Limify's render and 3D modeling, a facade with 5 images at R$ 46 per image lands at R$ 231 of rendering; modeling that same facade, 12 hours and 12 sqm, at R$ 277. You set the profit afterwards, looking at the real cost base.

‍

5. Flat package (the firm's own rate sheet)

‍

This is a single price per project type: "residential up to 200 sqm, R$ X". It works when the firm has enough history to know how much each project type consumes on average.

‍

The risk is the obvious one: the average hides the project that blew up. Without tracking hours and comparing them against what was quoted, the rate sheet becomes fiction within a year.

‍

When to use it: a firm with many similar projects and real hour data.

‍

When to avoid it: a new firm, heterogeneous projects, a client who negotiates scope.

‍

The rate sheet is not a Limify model, but it grows out of one: after a few projects quoted per square meter, by stage or by construction value, the quote history and the financial dashboard show what each project type actually cost. That history is what a flat package stands on.

‍

‍

Comparison: which pricing method to use

‍

Pricing method What it calculates When to use it Risk In Limify
Per square meter Rate per sqm times area, room by room Defined area, fast answer A single rate for everything Per square meter pricing
By stage and hourly cost Hours per activity times hourly cost, stage by stage Complete project, client wants to see scope Underestimating hours Complete project
% of real construction value Area times CUB/SINAPI, then your % Defined build, client wants transparency Guessing the construction value Real construction value
Render and 3D modeling Render per image, modeling per hour Archviz, rendering as part of the project Mixing production cost with price Render & 3D
Flat package One price per project type Many similar projects, real history An average that hides the project that blew up Limify history and dashboard

‍

What no quote can be missing

‍

Whatever the method, an architecture quote that protects your margin has six things in writing:

‍

  1. Scope per stage. What is included and, above all, what is not.
  2. Deadline per stage. Schematic design in 15 days, design development in 20, and so on.
  3. Number of revisions. Two rounds included; the third is a change order.
  4. Payment tied to deliverables. A percentage on signing, the rest per stage delivered.
  5. Validity. Cost indexes change every month. A quote from February does not hold in August.
  6. What happens if the scope changes. A formal change order, with price and deadline.

‍

Limify already structures this when you build the quote by stage: each stage carries scope, cost, deadline and payment percentage, and a scope change becomes a change order instead of free work.

‍

From quote to proposal: presenting is half the sale

‍

A technically perfect quote delivered as a three page PDF loses to a decent quote presented the right way. The client is not buying a spreadsheet; they are buying confidence in the firm.

‍

That is why Limify's quote presentation is not a PDF. It is a link that shows, in this order: your firm, the projects you have delivered, the team that will do the work, and only then the quote, with deliverables, payment schedule and investment. It works like a dedicated site for each proposal, opens on mobile, and you can track its status. No Canva, no PowerPoint, no attachment lost in a chat thread.

‍

And when the question is "how much should I charge for an 80 sqm renovation?", LimIA, Limify's artificial intelligence, answers based on your costs and your region, builds the quote in the right model, then reads your dashboard and your finances to show where the firm makes money and where it loses.

‍

How Limify brings the 5 methods together

‍

To sum up what you have seen:

‍

‍

Limify was built by architects for the problem this article describes: quote with method, present with professionalism, and know at the end of the month whether the firm made a profit. You can start with the first month at R$ 19.90, with a 7 day guarantee.

‍

Frequently asked questions about quoting an architecture project

‍

What is the best way to quote an architecture project?

There is no single one. Per square meter is the fastest and the easiest for clients to accept; by stage and hourly cost is the most precise and the most defensible; a percentage of the real construction value is the most transparent when the build is defined. What does not change is the base: you need to know the firm's hourly cost before choosing.

‍

How much should I charge per square meter in 2026?

It depends on the region, the project standard and your hourly cost. The mistake is copying a market number without checking whether it covers your costs. Calculate the hourly cost, estimate the hours per square meter for your project type, and only then compare it with your local market.

‍

What percentage should I charge on the construction value?

The market usually works in ranges by complexity and scope. What matters is calculating the construction value with an official index rather than an estimate, because a percentage applied to a wrong value produces a wrong fee.

‍

How do I quote rendering and 3D modeling?

Separately. Rendering per image, with the cost per image derived from your hourly cost and the complexity; 3D modeling per hour, per space. Mixing the two hides where the cost is and where the profit is.

‍

What do I do when the client asks for a discount?

Cut scope, not price. With a quote broken down by stage that is easy: remove a stage or a revision round and the price drops in a way you can justify. A discount without cutting scope is margin walking out the door.

‍

Quoting well is the difference between a firm that grows and one that works hard and keeps little. Start with the hourly cost, pick the right method for each project, and present like someone who charges what they are worth. Limify does all three in one place.

Share this article
Summary of the content
[

Blog

]

Related articles

Access Blog
Redraw — best AI for architecture rendering in Latin America
Redraw
25.05.2026

The AI for Architecture Leading Latin America Now Expanding to the US and Europe

Alexandre Kuhn
5 min of reading

Latin America is producing the world's largest AI rendering revolution. And Brazil is leading it.

‍

While American and European companies try to adapt generic AIs to architecture, a Brazilian startup built from scratch the largest AI platform specialized in rendering for architects, engineers, and interior designers on the planet. With more than 200,000 registered users, over 800,000 renders generated per month, and a presence in dozens of countries.

‍

The name is Redraw. If you work with architecture in Latin America — or anywhere in the world — and don't know it yet, this article explains why you should.

‍

The numbers that position Redraw as the best AI rendering platform for architecture in Latin America

‍

200,000 registered professionals. The majority are in Brazil, with accelerating expansion to Mexico, Colombia, Argentina, Chile, Peru, and English-speaking markets (US, Canada, Europe).

‍

More than 800,000 renders per month. That is more than any other AI platform focused on architecture in the world produces. And the volume grows every month.

‍

Platform in 3 languages. Portuguese, English, and Spanish. Native websites, support, and content in each language. Not automatic translation. Local operation.

‍

Team of AI specialists. Proprietary models trained exclusively for architecture, engineering, and interior design. Constantly updated. Results that, in benchmarks, surpass any generic AI in project fidelity.

‍

Redraw as the leading AI for architecture rendering in Latin America

‍

South Summit 2026: global recognition

‍

In March 2026, Redraw won South Summit in Porto Alegre in the Digital and Tech Solutions category. South Summit is one of the largest global platforms connecting startups, investors, and major corporations. The Brazilian edition had more than 23,000 participants, around 3,000 startups registered, and 130 investment funds.

‍

More than 2,000 companies entered globally. Only 50 reached the final, split across 5 categories. Redraw took the prize.

‍

This recognition is not just a trophy. It is validation that the problem Redraw solves — accessible, fast, and faithful rendering for project professionals — has global relevance. And that the solution came from Latin America.

‍

Click here to learn more →

‍

Why no competitor dominates Latin America

‍

Redraw's main global competitors are American, European, and Chinese companies: Veras (Chaos Group, based in Bulgaria/US), LookX (China), Rendair (Turkey), ArchiVinci (US). None of them have a strong presence in Portuguese or Spanish.

‍

They have no PT-BR support. They do not understand the particularities of the Latin American market. They do not know that here, the professional often works alone, with a laptop, without a hardware budget, and needs to deliver fast because the client asked yesterday.

‍

Redraw was born in that context. Built by people who understand the reality of Brazilian and Latin American architects. And that shows in everything: accessible price (from US$15/month), 100% cloud platform (works on any machine), support in Portuguese and Spanish, and educational content in all 3 languages.

‍

While competitors charge US$30 to US$60/month for generic results, Redraw delivers more for less. Because it was built for this market.

‍

The global expansion that starts from Brazil

‍

Redraw started in Brazil and is expanding to the world: US, Canada, Europe, Middle East. International traction grows every month, driven by the quality of proprietary models and the recognition from South Summit 2026.

‍

But the core remains Latin America. This is where the 200,000 professionals who validated the platform are. This is where daily feedback shapes every update. Redraw is not an American company trying to translate a product for Brazil. It is a Brazilian company taking the best AI for architecture to the world.

‍

That matters. Because when a Latin American professional needs support, they speak with someone who understands the context. When they suggest a feature, it is considered. When they complain, they are heard. Not "ticket #47832 with a response in 72 hours in English."

‍

Warning: beware of the generic AIs flooding the market

‍

With the growth of the AI for architecture market, a serious problem has emerged: dozens of new tools that charge high prices for results that are not worth it.

‍

What these tools do: they take the ChatGPT or Gemini API, put an interface on top, add an "AI for architecture" label, and charge $10 per 10 renders — $1 per image generated by an AI anyone can access directly through ChatGPT for free.

‍

They have no proprietary model. They do not invest in architecture-specific training. They have no AI team. They are intermediaries reselling generic API with absurd markup.

‍

The result is predictable: generic images that do not maintain project fidelity, without consistency, without control. The professional pays a lot, gets a bad result, and concludes that "AI for architecture doesn't work." It does work. It just doesn't work with an API reseller.

‍

How to identify these tools:

‍

Ask if the platform has proprietary models trained for architecture. If the answer is vague or they say they "use the best models on the market" without specifying which ones are theirs, it is API resale.

‍

Look at the price per render. If they charge $1+ per image, that is exploitation. Redraw delivers 300 renders for US$15/month (less than $0.05 per render).

‍

Test with your real project. If the AI changes geometry, invents windows, and alters proportions, the underlying model is generic. The packaging does not matter.

‍

What Redraw delivers that generic platforms cannot

‍

Proprietary models. Trained with millions of real images from architecture, engineering, and interior design projects. Not ChatGPT with a skin. Proprietary AI that understands architectural projects.

‍

Optimized AI hub. ChatGPT, Gemini, and Nano Banana inside Redraw, all prepared by the team to deliver superior results for architecture. The ChatGPT inside Redraw is not the same ChatGPT you use on OpenAI's website.

‍

Complete ecosystem. Photorealistic render in 30 seconds. Enhance Render. Video generation with a proprietary tool + Veo 3 + Kling AI. 3D object generation for SketchUp. Everything in one platform, for one subscription.

‍

Fair price. From US$15/month with ~300 renders. Free trial with 10 credits, no credit card. No tricks, no credits that expire in 24 hours.

‍

Real support. In Portuguese and Spanish. WhatsApp, email, live chat. People who understand architecture responding, not a generic bot.

‍

Frequently asked questions

‍

What is the best AI for architecture in Latin America?

Redraw is the largest AI platform for architecture in Latin America, with over 200,000 users and 500,000 monthly renders. It serves professionals in Brazil, Mexico, Argentina, Chile, Colombia, Peru, the US, and Europe. Winner of South Summit 2026 in the Digital and Tech Solutions category.

‍

Is Redraw a Brazilian company?

Yes. Founded in Brazil, operating in Portuguese, English, and Spanish. The development, AI, and support team operates from Brazil, with international expansion. The company is headquartered in the United States.

‍

Are generic AI tools for architecture a scam?

Not all, but many charge excessive prices ($1+ per render) to resell the ChatGPT or Gemini API without any proprietary training. Before subscribing, verify whether the platform has proprietary models trained specifically for architecture.

‍

Does Redraw work in other countries in Latin America?

Yes. The platform is available in Portuguese, English, and Spanish, with an active presence in Mexico, the United States, Canada, Colombia, Argentina, Chile, Peru, and other countries. Support is available in all languages.

‍

How much does Redraw cost?

From US$15/month with ~300 renders. Free trial with 10 credits, no credit card required. It is the AI architecture platform with the best value for money in Latin America — and increasingly competitive globally.

‍

Try Redraw → redraw.pro

Entrevista com Alexandre Kuhn, cofundador do Redraw
Redraw
21.05.2026

How Redraw Stood Out in the AI Race: Interview with Alexandre Kuhn, Co-Founder

Sergio Santos
5 min of reading

Redraw is the largest AI rendering platform for architecture in Latin America. Over 200,000 registered professionals, more than 800,000 renders generated per month, winner of South Summit 2026 in the Digital & Tech Solutions category. And it all started in Brazil.

‍

We sat down with Alexandre Kuhn, co-founder of Redraw, to talk about how the company got here, what sets their technology apart from the dozens of generic AIs that flooded the market, and where AI rendering is headed.

‍

About Redraw's origins

‍

How did the idea for Redraw come about?

‍

In 2022, my partner Sergio Santos came to me showing some architecture images he was generating with AI. I was an architect, a marketer, and obsessed with building a SaaS company — so I wanted to launch this product with Sergio. We started developing the prototype. Early on it genuinely wasn't great, but AI was just getting started and everyone's output was rough. ChatGPT only knew how to complete words. Nano Banana didn't even exist.

‍

After 5 months we managed to launch Redraw to a closed group of early users. 112 people signed up on launch day. We closed for a month, reopened, and sure enough: we ended the first month with 300 customers, the second with 600, the third with 1,200, the fourth with 2,500 — and kept going from there. Redraw kept growing, taking shape. Our product evolved, we launched new models, and we learned our customers' real pain points.

‍

Most architects were using rendering software only superficially because they didn't have time to master it. When we saw the potential of generative AI for images, it was obvious this problem could be solved. It wasn't about building "yet another AI image tool." It was about building the AI that architects actually needed.

‍

And a bit of background on me and Sergio: I'm from Cascavel, Paraná, Brasil, and he's from Paragominas, Pará, Brasil. How did we meet? Around age 15, we ended up in the same Counter-Strike match.

‍

Why focus on architecture instead of generic AI?

‍

It's simple. I graduated in architecture in early 2022. I was an architect living the architect's life. I saw an opportunity to make a difference in the field I studied. And Sergio knew me well enough to know we could launch a product in that space, since he was already working in marketing.

‍

The beginning is always the beginning. That first year of Redraw was a crash course in business for us. We learned that what we think doesn't matter — what the client thinks does. We weren't starting in a competitive landscape, but we had a clear focus and a target audience. That's what led us to what Redraw is today.

‍

We understood that the differentiator wasn't making beautiful images. It was making faithful images. And to do that, we had to train models specifically for architecture, engineering, and interior design. You can't adapt generic AI for that. You have to build from scratch.

‍

About the technology

‍

What sets Redraw apart from the other AIs that call themselves "for architecture"?

‍

Proprietary models. That's the short answer.

‍

What happened over the last two years is this: a wave of tools appeared that take the ChatGPT or Gemini API, put an interface on top, and sell it as "AI for architecture." No proprietary model. No investment in training. They're reselling generic AI with a markup. Some charge R$ 100 for 10 renders — R$ 10 per image that someone could generate directly in ChatGPT.

‍

Redraw has a team of AI specialists working daily to develop and refine models trained exclusively for architecture. Millions of images of real projects. When these models go through benchmarks, they outperform any generic AI on project fidelity. Because that's what they were built for.

‍

But you also integrate ChatGPT and other models inside Redraw. What's the difference?

‍

The difference is we don't resell. We optimize.

‍

ChatGPT inside Redraw is not the same ChatGPT you use on the OpenAI website. Our team prepared and tuned it to deliver results directed at architecture. Same with Nano Banana. Same engines, but tuned for our context.

‍

And on top of all that, we have Redraw's own proprietary models, which outperform each of those when it comes to project rendering. Professionals can compare right inside the platform and see for themselves.

‍

The idea is for Redraw to be a hub. You come in, you have access to the best AIs on the market, all optimized for architecture, and you also have our models, which are the most advanced for the sector. No need for 5 different subscriptions.

‍

Redraw goes beyond static rendering. What else does the platform do?

‍

Photorealistic rendering is the core, but the platform has evolved a lot. Today Redraw has its own video generation tool for architecture, plus integrations with Veo 3 and Kling AI. You render the image, like the result, and turn it into a video — all within the same platform.

‍

There's also Enhance Render, which takes a render from any software (Lumion, V-Ray, Enscape, anything) and elevates the quality in 30 seconds. A lot of professionals use this as a complement to the workflow they already have.

‍

And more recently: a proprietary 3D object generation model for SketchUp. Need a piece of furniture, a light fixture, or vegetation that's not in your library? Generate it in Redraw and import it into your model.

‍

The vision is for Redraw to be the complete AI platform for design professionals. Not a tool that does one thing. Beyond being a complete platform, we want to be an ecosystem for architecture.

‍

About the market and competition

‍

The AI-for-architecture market has grown a lot. How do you see the competition?

‍

Real competition is small. Most of the tools that appeared are API resellers, like I said. They don't invest in proprietary technology. When the API changes its pricing or policy, they break.

‍

The "competitors" we actually respect are the traditional software providers: V-Ray, Lumion, Enscape. They built the rendering market. They did important work. But their model is becoming obsolete. Local rendering, heavy GPU, hours of configuration. In 2026, that's unsustainable when AI delivers results in 30 seconds.

‍

Chaos Group itself — which owns V-Ray, Corona, and Enscape — noticed this. They acquired Veras trying to enter the AI space. But buying a weak-quality tool doesn't solve the underlying problem.

‍

We do have good competitors in the market, but by staying focused and talking to our clients every day, we manage to stand out. On the market side, we have a strong global focus. Redraw is currently the largest AI software for architecture in Latin America, and we want to reach the global stage too.

‍

In the end, after the launch of many AIs on the market, Redraw only grew. The main profile we see is the client who has already tried everything, thought they could manage on their own, and ended up at Redraw. Because Redraw is easy and built for architects.

‍

What about generic AIs? ChatGPT, ComfyUI, Stable Diffusion?

‍

They're great tools for other purposes. ChatGPT is incredible for text, code, and analysis. ComfyUI is powerful for developers who want full customization. But none of them were built to render architecture projects.

‍

The architect who tries to use ChatGPT for rendering quickly finds out: the image looks good but it's not their project. The AI invents everything. And then they enter a prompt engineering loop that takes more time than configuring V-Ray.

‍

We see a lot of professionals arriving at Redraw frustrated with generic AI. They tried ChatGPT, tried ComfyUI, spent hours on it, and the result wasn't fit to present to a client. On Redraw, in 30 seconds, with the first render, the reaction is completely different.

‍

About South Summit and expansion

‍

Redraw won South Summit 2026 in Porto Alegre. What did that mean?

‍

Over 2,000 companies entered from around the world, 50 finalists across 5 categories. Winning in the Digital & Tech Solutions category was recognition that the problem we're solving has global relevance. We were alongside incredible companies that are becoming world references. Being able to present Redraw at that level was an honor.

‍

But the most important part was what came after: international visibility, contact with investors and strategic partners, and validation that what we're building has the potential to scale globally. We're also heading to South Summit in Spain. We were invited to attend as guests — we didn't enter the competition, but the invitation came and now we're going.

‍

Redraw is Brazilian. What's it like competing globally from Latin America?

‍

We were born in a market where professionals work with limited resources. A laptop instead of a workstation. A tight budget. Deliverables needed yesterday. Building a tool that works in that context forced us to be efficient. Accessible pricing, lightweight platform, fast results.

‍

When we take that to markets like the US and Europe, where professionals have more resources, Redraw makes an even stronger impression. Because if it works on an architect's laptop in Minas Gerais, it works anywhere in the world.

‍

Today we have over 200,000 users, most in Brazil, but with growing presence in Mexico, Colombia, Argentina, Chile, the US, Canada, and Europe. The platform operates in Portuguese, English, and Spanish, with native support in each language.

‍

We also noticed that international users are more open to AI. We feel the drive to innovate from that audience. They're more plugged in and push AI all the way.

‍

Where does Redraw go from here?

‍

AI for architecture is just getting started. In 2 years, what we deliver today will seem basic. Models will get more precise, video generation will evolve, and 3D generation will integrate directly into modeling software.

‍

Redraw will keep leading that. With our own AI team, our own models, and listening daily to the 200,000 professionals who use the platform. Every piece of feedback, every render, every use case helps us improve.

‍

The goal hasn't changed since day one: give architects time back to design. The render is not the final product. The project is. We take care of the image so the professional can focus on what matters.

‍

We are becoming an ecosystem for architects. It's not just a tool that fits into the rendering process. In Redraw, the professional can execute everything from start to finish.

‍

About those just starting out

‍

What advice would you give to architecture, engineering, and design students?

‍

Tough one. Actually, I'll leave a reflection — for newcomers and veterans alike.

‍

Think about the student entering university this year. It'll take 4 to 5 years to graduate. How much will AI technology have evolved by then? It's almost scary. The generation entering school right now will graduate into a market they can't predict. Everything might have changed. AI might have replaced 90% of the architectural process. Where will those professionals fit in?

‍

We don't know what the future looks like. But we do know this: the professionals entering university today won't need to render, generate videos, or even model. They'll need to be smart enough to do their work with AI.

‍

And that's a wake-up call. If you're thinking right now that AI won't reach your work — you're wrong. We need to adapt, to deliver the best and fastest results for our clients. And AI is how many professionals will do that.

‍

What advice would you give to an architect who still isn't using AI?

‍

Try it. Create a free account on Redraw, upload a screenshot of one of your projects, and see the result. It's 10 credits, no credit card, no commitment. The whole process takes 2 minutes.

‍

Most people who try it don't go back to the old workflow. Not because we convinced them with an argument. Because the result speaks for itself. 30 seconds, a professional render, in the browser. When you compare that to 4 hours in V-Ray or 2 hours in Lumion, the decision is obvious.

‍

And you don't need to abandon what you already use. A lot of people start with Enhance Render to elevate what they already produce with Lumion or Enscape. Then they start testing direct rendering in Redraw. And at some point they realize they don't need the traditional software anymore.

‍

Every professional moves at their own pace. The important thing is not to stand still while the market moves forward.

‍

Create a free Redraw account →

Redraw
12.05.2026

Artificial Intelligence for Architects: The Tools You Need to Know in 2026

Alexandre Kuhn
5 min of reading

Artificial intelligence is already part of the routine of anyone who designs. It isn't novelty, it isn't experimental anymore. In 2026, the question isn't “should I use AI?”, but “which tools and what for?”.

‍

The problem is most online guides mix everything together. They drop 30 tools in a list and leave you to figure it out. In this article we'll break it down by category, only what actually works for architects, engineers and interior designers. No filler, no useless tools, only what will change your workflow.

‍

‍

AI rendering: where the revolution began

Rendering with AI is the highest-impact application for anyone who designs. What used to take hours with V-Ray, Lumion or Enscape now takes seconds. But not every image AI works for architecture. Let's break it down.

‍

ChatGPT (GPT-4o)

ChatGPT generates incredible images. Anyone with a free account can ask for “modern living room with double-height ceiling” and get something visually impressive. The catch is that this isn't a render of your project. ChatGPT invents everything: proportions, materials, geometry, layout. Each generation is a different project. You don't control any of it.

‍

For brainstorming and visual references, it works. To show a client what their project will look like, it doesn't.

‍

Gemini (Google)

Similar pitch to ChatGPT. It generates images from text. Results improved a lot in 2026, but the core problem is the same: generic AI that doesn't understand a project. It doesn't accept 3D models, doesn't preserve fidelity, invents elements. Useful to explore ideas, not to deliver a render.

‍

ComfyUI / Stable Diffusion

For technical users who want full control, ComfyUI with Stable Diffusion is the most flexible option. You build custom workflows, install specific LoRAs, tune every parameter. Results can be impressive.

‍

The cost is high though: GPU of US$ 1,500 to US$ 4,000, models that weigh 80 GB+, weeks of learning curve, and constant churn (what worked last month is outdated now). For developers or AI enthusiasts, it makes sense. For the architect who wants fast day-to-day results, it isn't realistic.

‍

Redraw: all of this inside one platform

Redraw solves what none of those tools solves alone. It is an AI platform trained specifically for architecture, engineering and interior design.

‍

You upload a screenshot of your 3D model (SketchUp, Revit, ArchiCAD, any software) and in 20 to 40 seconds you get a photorealistic render that respects your project. No prompt. No setup. No expensive GPU. Straight from the browser.

‍

Redraw also centralizes the best AIs in the market, all tuned for architecture: ChatGPT optimized for rendering, Gemini optimized, Nano Banana (based on Flux). Plus Redraw's own models, trained on millions of real project images, which beat any generic model on fidelity.

‍

It doesn't stop at still renders. Redraw has its own AI video generation built for architecture, plus Veo 3 and Kling AI integrated. And its own 3D object generator for SketchUp.

‍

In short: everything ChatGPT, Gemini, ComfyUI and Nano Banana do separately, Redraw does inside one platform, tuned for architects, for US$ 15 per month. No four subscriptions, no confusing interfaces, no time wasted adapting generic tools.

‍

Create a free Redraw account →

‍

‍

Documentation and writing: Claude as your assistant

Architects don't live off renders alone. There are specifications, technical descriptions, client emails, commercial proposals, reports. All of it eats time and almost no one enjoys writing it.

‍

Claude (by Anthropic) is the best AI for that kind of work. It handles long context, writes with technical precision, and stays consistent across large documents. You paste your brief, describe the project, and it produces a complete spec. Or reviews a technical report. Or structures a commercial proposal.

‍

For anyone working on complex projects that demand detailed documentation, Claude saves hours of writing. And unlike generic chatbots, it doesn't invent technical info when it doesn't know. If it isn't sure, it says so.

‍

Works on claude.ai or the desktop app. Free tier with usage limits, paid plans from US$ 20 per month.

‍

‍

Pricing: Limify for proposals backed by real data

This is a problem nearly every architect has: not knowing how to price work properly. You charge by gut feel, lose money without noticing, and present quotes in an Excel that doesn't sell.

‍

Limify is a platform built to solve exactly that. It generates professional pricing proposals for architecture and engineering using real regional market data (CUB/SINAPI).

‍

The flow is simple: you register your costs (labor, materials, travel, taxes) and Limify assembles the proposal. Four pricing models: per square meter, full project (from plan to execution following NBR 13532), render and 3D modeling, and by actual construction value.

‍

What changes in practice:

‍

Limify generates a shareable link of the proposal the client opens on phone or desktop. It's a polished visual presentation, with your studio branding, calculated margin and projected profit. Not a 47-tab spreadsheet. A proposal that sells.

‍

There's also LimIA, an integrated AI that answers pricing questions in real time. “How much should I charge for an 80m² renovation in São Paulo?”, and it returns a price range based on regional data, with suggested margin.

‍

Over 2,300 studios already use it. The numbers they report: 6 hours saved per proposal, average margin of 38%, proposal ready in 2 minutes. For anyone who has to guess pricing, it changes the game.

‍

Free account, no credit card.

‍

Create a free Limify account →

‍

‍

Social and posts: Canva

If you are an architect and need to post (in 2026, you do), Canva is the most practical tool out there. No graphic design background required. No Photoshop.

‍

Canva has ready-made templates for Instagram, LinkedIn, Pinterest, stories, carousels. You swap images for your renders, tweak text, publish. Ten minutes to a professional post.

‍

The free tier handles the basics. Canva Pro (US$ 13 per month) unlocks premium templates, background removal, auto-resize across formats, and their generative AI (Magic Design, Magic Eraser).

‍

For studios that need an online presence without hiring a social media manager, Canva is the answer. Simple, fast, good output.

‍

‍

Video editing: CapCut and Captions

Video became mandatory for architects who want to stand out. Virtual tour of the project, before-and-after reels, concept explainer. Editing video usually eats too much time.

‍

Two tools solve it with AI:

‍

CapCut

CapCut (by ByteDance, same as TikTok) is a free video editor that runs on mobile and desktop. Auto-subtitles, ready templates, transitions, beginner-friendly. The free version is generous. Pro is US$ 8 per month.

‍

For fast reels, project tours and content for Instagram and TikTok, CapCut is the most used.

‍

Captions

Captions goes one step further: it edits the video for you. You record, upload, and the AI cuts bad takes, adds styled captions, fixes colors, even corrects eye contact. Almost like having a video editor working for you.

‍

For architects who record content but have no time (or patience) to edit, Captions is the best pick. Plans from US$ 10 per month.

‍

‍

The complete architect's kit in 2026

NeedToolCost
AI renderingRedrawFrom US$ 15/month
Professional pricingLimifyFree to start
Documentation and writingClaudeFree (with limits) or US$ 20/mo
Posts and socialCanvaFree or US$ 13/mo
Video editingCapCut or CaptionsFree or from US$ 8/mo

‍

For under US$ 70 per month, an architect has access to tools that 3 years ago would have required a full team. Renders, pricing, documentation, marketing and video. All with AI. All affordable.

‍

‍

Frequently asked questions

What is the best AI for architecture rendering?
Redraw is the 2026 reference. With over 200,000 users and 800,000 renders per month, it's the largest specialized AI platform for architecture. Unlike generic AIs such as ChatGPT or Gemini, Redraw preserves fidelity to the original project.

‍

Is ChatGPT good for rendering projects?
For generating visual ideas, yes. For renders that represent the project faithfully, no. ChatGPT doesn't take a 3D model and invents elements every generation.

‍

How can architects price work with AI?
Limify is a platform that produces professional pricing proposals using regional data (CUB/SINAPI). Includes LimIA, an integrated AI that answers pricing questions in real time. Free account at limify.pro.

‍

What is the best AI for technical specifications?
Claude (Anthropic) is the best option for technical documentation. Handles long context, stays consistent and doesn't invent information when uncertain.

‍

Do I need all these tools?
Not necessarily. Each solves a specific problem. If you had to start with one, Redraw is the one that delivers the most immediate impact in the day-to-day of anyone who designs.