Comparison for architecture
A direct comparison, with a case study, between Redraw and Nano Banana used on its own. Nano Banana is a strong model, and it is available inside Redraw. This comparison measures how much of the result comes from the model and how much comes from what surrounds it. Analysis restricted to the architecture, engineering and interior design sector.
An AI Hub specialized in architecture. Beyond its own rendering model, it brings several AIs together in one place, Nano Banana included, and handles the request through the interface: presets, brush and ready-made use cases. No complex prompt, no installation, 100% in the browser.
Google's image model, good at editing and transforming an image without taking the scene apart. Used on its own, it works by prompt: whatever you want to preserve or change has to fit into words. It was not built for architecture and does not know the technical elements of a project.
Criterion by criterion
Every result came from the same 3D model, with the same input image, on both paths.
Which one controls the light of the scene precisely and without rework.
In Redraw the light is more direct and more repeatable: you click the condition you want and it arrives with direction and shadow. With the model on its own the light does come out, but it changes from one generation to the next. This holds for both sides: whenever you change the light of a scene, check the materials in the result, because a strong light transformation affects finishes.
Which one preserves the proportions, the structure and the camera angles of the project.
Geometry is no longer what separates the two. In the version we tested, both preserve framing and structure. In Redraw that is the default, and the reading of the technical elements of the project was more precise. With the model on its own, whatever you did not mention is left to its judgment.
Which one recognizes and preserves materials such as woods, concretes and finishes.
Neither of them preserves everything. In our tests, Redraw kept the specified cabinetry and finish items, and the model on its own added furniture that did not exist in the project. For a client presentation, invented decor is the most expensive mistake. When the initial modeling is poor, neither of them solves it: a good 3D model is still the starting point.
The summary
On the criteria of day-to-day operation, Redraw leads. The model on its own takes creative freedom. On geometry and texture, the score is tied today.
Redraw does not compete with the model, it gives you the model. Nano Banana 2 and Nano Banana Pro are on the platform, alongside Redraw's own rendering model and other image, video and 3D AIs. Each one at the right moment, in the same workflow, with your projects in one place.
In Redraw, Nano Banana already comes through your plan's credits.
The same 3D model, rendered by Redraw, faithful to the project. Drag to compare.
10 free credits, no credit card.
The AI that transforms how you create architecture, engineering and design projects.
Redraw ai solutions LLC